PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQWA vs. WTTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQWA vs. WTTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and Select Energy Services, Inc. (WTTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQWA achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly lower than WTTR's 82.22% return.


AQWA

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-0.68%
6M
-3.10%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
9.10%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*

WTTR

1D
0.64%
1M
14.27%
YTD
82.22%
6M
71.62%
1Y
127.63%
3Y*
38.41%
5Y*
25.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQWA vs. WTTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
-0.68%13.15%4.34%20.13%-19.89%15.85%
WTTR
Select Energy Services, Inc.
82.22%-18.31%79.17%-15.63%49.18%27.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AQWA and WTTR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2021

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQWA vs. WTTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQWA
AQWA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
AQWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQWA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
AQWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQWA Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

WTTR
WTTR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
WTTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTTR Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
WTTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTTR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQWA vs. WTTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and Select Energy Services, Inc. (WTTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AQWAWTTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.44

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

6.28

-6.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.17

17.45

-17.29

AQWA vs. WTTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the WTTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQWA and WTTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AQWAWTTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

2.93

-2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.51

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.07

+0.25

Drawdowns

AQWA vs. WTTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQWA drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum WTTR drawdown of -89.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQWA and WTTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQWAWTTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.44%

-89.49%

+60.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-20.45%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.55%

-50.66%

+36.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-50.66%

+21.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.78%

-5.29%

-5.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-53.41%

+45.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

7.34%

-2.44%

Volatility

AQWA vs. WTTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) is 3.94%, while Select Energy Services, Inc. (WTTR) has a volatility of 10.96%. This indicates that AQWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQWAWTTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

10.96%

-7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

30.77%

-19.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.33%

43.98%

-29.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

49.91%

-33.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

61.06%

-44.41%

Dividends

AQWA vs. WTTR - Dividend Comparison

AQWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, which matches WTTR's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
1.48%1.47%1.40%1.53%1.56%1.20%
WTTR
Select Energy Services, Inc.
1.48%2.66%1.89%2.77%0.54%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AQWA and WTTR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTTR has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to AQWA (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQWA dropped -29.44% vs WTTR's -89.49%.

WTTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQWA and WTTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer