WTTR vs. NVO
WTTR (Select Energy Services, Inc.) and NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) are both stocks. WTTR operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while NVO operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, WTTR returned 25.38%/yr vs 2.89%/yr for NVO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WTTR vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTTR achieves a 82.22% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -14.57% return.
WTTR
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 14.27%
- YTD
- 82.22%
- 6M
- 71.62%
- 1Y
- 127.63%
- 3Y*
- 38.41%
- 5Y*
- 25.38%
- 10Y*
- —
NVO
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- -14.57%
- 6M
- -8.62%
- 1Y
- -38.01%
- 3Y*
- -16.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- 6.21%
WTTR vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTTR Select Energy Services, Inc. | 82.22% | -18.31% | 79.17% | -15.63% | 49.18% | 51.95% | -55.82% | 46.84% | -65.35% | 30.10% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -14.57% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 63.52% | 23.33% | 28.70% | -12.98% | 50.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTTR and NVO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2017 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
WTTR:
$2.14B
NVO:
$186.85B
WTTR:
$0.20
NVO:
$27.42
WTTR:
96.07
NVO:
1.53
WTTR:
0.25
NVO:
0.07
WTTR:
1.48
NVO:
0.57
WTTR:
2.15
NVO:
0.92
WTTR:
$1.40B
NVO:
$327.80B
WTTR:
$254.32M
NVO:
$268.30B
WTTR:
$216.78M
NVO:
$181.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTTR vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
WTTR
NVO
WTTR vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Select Energy Services, Inc. (WTTR) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTTR | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.93 | -0.74 | +3.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.48 | -0.83 | +4.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.88 | +0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | -0.69 | +6.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.45 | -1.03 | +18.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTTR | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93 | -0.74 | +3.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.08 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.47 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
WTTR vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTTR drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTTR and NVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTTR | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.49% | -74.70% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.45% | -55.03% | +34.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.66% | -74.70% | +24.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.66% | -74.70% | +24.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -69.48% | +64.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.41% | -17.76% | -35.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.34% | 36.88% | -29.54% |
Volatility
WTTR vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
Select Energy Services, Inc. (WTTR) has a higher volatility of 10.96% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 7.84%. This indicates that WTTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTTR | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.96% | 7.84% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.77% | 37.83% | -7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.98% | 51.76% | -7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.91% | 38.21% | +11.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.06% | 32.49% | +28.57% |
Dividends
WTTR vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
WTTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than NVO's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.29% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
WTTR Select Energy Services, Inc. | 1.48% | 2.66% | 1.89% | 2.77% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WTTR vs. NVO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Select Energy Services, Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WTTR vs. NVO - Profitability Comparison
WTTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 65.28M and revenue of 365.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.
NVO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a gross profit of 83.23B and revenue of 96.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.0%.
WTTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.97M and revenue of 365.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
NVO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported an operating income of 59.62B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.
WTTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 8.61M and revenue of 365.96M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
NVO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a net income of 48.56B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WTTR and NVO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTTR has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to NVO (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTTR dropped -89.49% vs NVO's -74.70%.
WTTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTTR and NVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer