PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQWA vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQWA vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQWA achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.78% return.


AQWA

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
-2.34%
1Y
1.35%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*

SCHB

1D
0.45%
1M
4.65%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.45%
1Y
28.80%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQWA vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
-0.50%13.15%4.34%20.13%-19.89%15.85%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.78%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%13.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AQWA and SCHB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2021

0.71

The correlation between AQWA and SCHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AQWA vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AQWA
SCHB

Industrials

56.9%
9.4%

Utilities

34.8%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.6%

Technology

2.0%
34.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
10.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.0%

Communication Services

-

10.1%

Energy

-

3.7%

Financial Services

-

12.2%

Healthcare

-

8.9%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Industrials

AQWA
56.9%
SCHB
9.4%

Utilities

AQWA
34.8%
SCHB
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

AQWA
2.9%
SCHB
4.6%

Technology

AQWA
2.0%
SCHB
34.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AQWA
1.7%
SCHB
10.1%

Basic Materials

AQWA
1.7%
SCHB
2.0%

Communication Services

AQWA

-

SCHB
10.1%

Energy

AQWA

-

SCHB
3.7%

Financial Services

AQWA

-

SCHB
12.2%

Healthcare

AQWA

-

SCHB
8.9%

Real Estate

AQWA

-

SCHB
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQWA vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQWA
AQWA Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
AQWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQWA Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AQWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQWA Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQWA vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AQWASCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.43

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

3.25

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

14.90

-14.63

AQWA vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQWA and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AQWASCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

2.39

-2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.75

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.83

-0.51

Drawdowns

AQWA vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQWA drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQWA and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQWASCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.44%

-35.27%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-8.91%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.55%

-19.34%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-25.41%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.62%

-0.27%

-10.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-4.11%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

1.94%

+3.00%

Volatility

AQWA vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 2.97%. This indicates that AQWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQWASCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

2.97%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

9.14%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

12.11%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

17.24%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

18.31%

-1.66%

AQWA vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQWA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AQWA vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

AQWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than SCHB's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
1.48%1.47%1.40%1.53%1.56%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.01%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AQWA and SCHB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AQWA has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to SCHB (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQWA dropped -29.44% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 5-year performance, SCHB leads with 12.86% vs 4.66% for AQWA. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for AQWA.

AQWA has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.01% for SCHB.

AQWA is categorized as Water Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. AQWA tracks Solactive Global Clean Water Industry Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AQWA and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQWA and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer