PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQWA vs. DAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AQWA vs. DAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AQWA vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
2.38%13.15%4.34%20.13%-19.89%15.85%
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
-6.25%39.00%10.55%23.62%-18.47%-1.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQWA achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's -6.25% return.


AQWA

1D
1.25%
1M
-7.26%
YTD
2.38%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
10Y*

DAX

1D
1.45%
1M
-6.35%
YTD
-6.25%
6M
-5.30%
1Y
10.17%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
8.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AQWA vs. DAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQWA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DAX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AQWA vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQWA
AQWA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AQWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQWA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AQWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQWA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

DAX
DAX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQWA vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AQWADAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.51

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

0.85

+0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

0.75

+0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.17

2.61

+1.56

AQWA vs. DAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the DAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQWA and DAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AQWADAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.51

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.33

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between AQWA and DAX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AQWA vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison

AQWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than DAX's 1.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
1.44%1.47%1.40%1.53%1.56%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
1.57%1.47%2.24%2.48%2.80%2.65%2.25%2.47%3.33%1.73%1.78%1.41%

Drawdowns

AQWA vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQWA drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum DAX drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQWA and DAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AQWADAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.44%

-45.58%

+16.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-14.82%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.04%

-10.00%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-10.58%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

4.23%

-0.72%

Volatility

AQWA vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) is 5.57%, while Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) has a volatility of 8.46%. This indicates that AQWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AQWADAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

8.46%

-2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

12.77%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

20.20%

-4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

20.20%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

21.21%

-4.54%