AQMNX vs. RYMTX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX).
AQMNX is an actively managed fund by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jan 6, 2010. RYMTX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Mar 1, 2007.
Performance
AQMNX vs. RYMTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AQMNX vs. RYMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N | 9.49% | 14.38% | 7.96% | 1.79% | 35.16% | -1.31% | -0.62% | 1.57% | -9.12% | -1.19% |
RYMTX Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 6.91% | 5.52% | 0.56% | 3.62% | 14.75% | 2.62% | 2.07% | 7.18% | -7.87% | 7.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AQMNX achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than RYMTX's 6.91% return. Over the past 10 years, AQMNX has outperformed RYMTX with an annualized return of 4.16%, while RYMTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.72% annualized return.
AQMNX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 19.86%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.16%
RYMTX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 17.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AQMNX vs. RYMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AQMNX has a 2.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RYMTX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AQMNX vs. RYMTX — Risk / Return Rank
AQMNX
RYMTX
AQMNX vs. RYMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AQMNX | RYMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 1.52 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 2.06 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.29 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 2.71 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 10.84 | +0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AQMNX | RYMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 1.52 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 0.51 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.26 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.09 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between AQMNX and RYMTX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AQMNX vs. RYMTX - Dividend Comparison
AQMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than RYMTX's 5.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N | 1.87% | 2.05% | 3.61% | 8.15% | 12.59% | 6.59% | 4.17% | 2.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 6.30% |
RYMTX Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 5.64% | 6.03% | 5.10% | 1.02% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 7.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.70% | 5.19% | 2.68% |
Drawdowns
AQMNX vs. RYMTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AQMNX drawdown since its inception was -27.50%, smaller than the maximum RYMTX drawdown of -34.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQMNX and RYMTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQMNX | RYMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.50% | -34.19% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -6.69% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.70% | -17.54% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.13% | -17.54% | -6.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -1.82% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -19.07% | +8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 1.70% | +0.13% |
Volatility
AQMNX vs. RYMTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) is 2.59%, while Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that AQMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AQMNX | RYMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 4.26% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 10.16% | -3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.48% | 12.39% | -2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.48% | 12.15% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.32% | 10.68% | -0.36% |