AQMNX vs. LCSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AQMNX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N) and LCSIX (LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 10 years, AQMNX returned 4.72%/yr vs 2.81%/yr for LCSIX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AQMNX charges 2.97%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for LCSIX.

Performance

AQMNX vs. LCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQMNX achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than LCSIX's 2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, AQMNX has outperformed LCSIX with an annualized return of 4.72%, while LCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.81% annualized return.

AQMNX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.14%
• YTD: 12.66%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 24.59%
• 3Y*: 12.17%
• 5Y*: 12.40%
• 10Y*: 4.72%

LCSIX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 2.44%
• 6M: 1.85%
• 1Y: 2.66%
• 3Y*: -2.00%
• 5Y*: 1.09%
• 10Y*: 2.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQMNX vs. LCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N	12.66%	14.38%	7.96%	1.79%	35.16%	-1.31%	-0.62%	1.57%	-9.12%	-1.19%
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund	2.44%	1.13%	-8.29%	-3.07%	6.04%	14.90%	9.90%	-5.97%	15.16%	6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AQMNX and LCSIX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2012	0.17

The correlation between AQMNX and LCSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (5 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AQMNX vs. LCSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQMNX

AQMNX Risk / Return Rank: 89
AQMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AQMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AQMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AQMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AQMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

LCSIX

LCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6
LCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
LCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
LCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
LCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
LCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQMNX vs. LCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AQMNX	LCSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	0.45	+2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	0.65	+3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.09	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.89	0.72	+7.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.06	1.39	+23.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AQMNX vs. LCSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the LCSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQMNX and LCSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AQMNX	LCSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	0.45	+2.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	0.20	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.42	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.45	-0.06

Drawdowns

AQMNX vs. LCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQMNX drawdown since its inception was -27.50%, which is greater than LCSIX's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQMNX and LCSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AQMNX	LCSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.50%	-25.13%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.15%	-3.87%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.70%	-11.60%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.70%	-13.21%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.13%	-13.54%	-10.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-9.05%	+8.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.40%	-6.37%	-4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	2.00%	-1.01%

Volatility

AQMNX vs. LCSIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) at 1.11%. This indicates that AQMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AQMNX	LCSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	1.11%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.65%	5.22%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.63%	6.20%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.55%	5.50%	+6.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.33%	6.67%	+3.66%

AQMNX vs. LCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQMNX has a 2.97% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AQMNX vs. LCSIX - Dividend Comparison

AQMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than LCSIX's 2.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N	1.82%	2.05%	3.61%	8.15%	12.59%	6.59%	4.17%	2.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	6.30%
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund	2.26%	2.32%	2.75%	1.88%	10.75%	7.14%	2.94%	0.54%	12.36%	0.02%	3.21%	7.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AQMNX and LCSIX in my portfolio?

AQMNX and LCSIX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AQMNX or LCSIX?

AQMNX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to LCSIX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQMNX dropped -27.50% vs LCSIX's -25.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AQMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.