PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQMNX vs. ADAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQMNX vs. ADAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I (ADAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQMNX achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than ADAIX's 3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, AQMNX has underperformed ADAIX with an annualized return of 4.42%, while ADAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.89% annualized return.


AQMNX

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
10.44%
6M
11.03%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
4.42%

ADAIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
3.04%
6M
3.04%
1Y
6.23%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
6.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQMNX vs. ADAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AQMNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N
10.44%14.38%7.96%1.79%35.16%-1.31%-0.62%1.57%-9.12%-1.19%
ADAIX
AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I
3.04%8.03%3.19%4.51%-3.30%6.27%25.24%8.53%2.19%5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AQMNX and ADAIX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQMNX vs. ADAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQMNX
AQMNX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AQMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AQMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ADAIX
ADAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ADAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ADAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQMNX vs. ADAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I (ADAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AQMNXADAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

2.13

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.55

13.87

-6.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.40

41.91

-18.51

AQMNX vs. ADAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the ADAIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQMNX and ADAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AQMNX vs. ADAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQMNX drawdown since its inception was -27.50%, which is greater than ADAIX's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQMNX and ADAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQMNXADAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.50%

-14.75%

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-0.46%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

-1.78%

-11.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

-7.40%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.13%

-14.75%

-9.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-0.08%

-2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-2.82%

-7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.15%

+0.86%

Volatility

AQMNX vs. ADAIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I (ADAIX) at 0.33%. This indicates that AQMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQMNXADAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

0.33%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.75%

1.05%

+5.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.78%

1.41%

+7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.52%

2.61%

+8.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.33%

4.32%

+6.01%

AQMNX vs. ADAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQMNX has a 2.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ADAIX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

AQMNX vs. ADAIX - Dividend Comparison

AQMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than ADAIX's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADAIX
AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I
2.06%2.12%1.23%2.74%0.10%0.65%1.60%2.11%6.53%7.17%7.18%4.93%
AQMNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N
1.86%2.05%3.61%8.15%12.59%6.59%4.17%2.92%0.00%0.00%0.02%6.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


AQMNX and ADAIX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AQMNX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to ADAIX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQMNX dropped -27.50% vs ADAIX's -14.75%.

ADAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQMNX and ADAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer