AQLGX vs. FSPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alta Quality Growth Fund (AQLGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).
AQLGX is managed by Alta Capital. It was launched on Dec 19, 2018. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
AQLGX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AQLGX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQLGX Alta Quality Growth Fund | 0.00% | 8.35% | 13.01% | 30.70% | -29.35% | 20.05% | 20.21% | 34.04% | 2.12% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.03% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | 2.05% |
Returns By Period
AQLGX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSPGX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.03%
- 6M
- -12.06%
- 1Y
- 14.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AQLGX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AQLGX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AQLGX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
AQLGX
FSPGX
AQLGX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alta Quality Growth Fund (AQLGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AQLGX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.78 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between AQLGX and FSPGX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AQLGX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
AQLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.67%, more than FSPGX's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQLGX Alta Quality Growth Fund | 85.67% | 85.67% | 9.23% | 0.11% | 6.55% | 1.90% | 0.05% | 2.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.40% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
AQLGX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQLGX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -32.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -16.17% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.43% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility
AQLGX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AQLGX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.32% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.46% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.63% | — |