AQEC vs. SCHK
AQEC (AQE Core ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AQEC is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AQEC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
AQEC vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AQEC achieves a -6.71% return, which is significantly lower than SCHK's 8.27% return.
AQEC
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -6.71%
- 6M
- -7.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 21.01%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- —
AQEC vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AQEC AQE Core ETF | -6.71% | 3.90% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 8.27% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between AQEC and SCHK is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AQEC vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
AQEC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHK
AQEC vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQE Core ETF (AQEC) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AQEC | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AQEC vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AQEC drawdown since its inception was -12.81%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQEC and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQEC | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.81% | -34.80% | +21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.04% | -3.22% | -5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -5.16% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
AQEC vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AQEC | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 12.77% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 17.33% | -4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 19.11% | -6.62% |
AQEC vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AQEC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AQEC vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
AQEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than SCHK's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQEC AQE Core ETF | 0.96% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.05% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AQEC and SCHK have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AQEC.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.96% for AQEC.
They also come from different issuers: Arlington Asset Management and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AQEC and 0.03% for SCHK.
Find the right allocation for AQEC and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer