PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APWEX vs. RMLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APWEX vs. RMLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund (APWEX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APWEX achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly lower than RMLPX's 36.63% return.


APWEX

1D
-1.17%
1M
0.85%
6M
18.49%
YTD
26.01%
1Y
34.02%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
22.16%
10Y*
11.37%

RMLPX

1D
-1.14%
1M
5.98%
6M
31.71%
YTD
36.63%
1Y
42.99%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
27.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APWEX vs. RMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
APWEX
Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund
26.01%21.35%13.22%4.57%32.44%36.63%-0.00%8.29%-24.50%
RMLPX
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund
36.63%8.98%30.03%16.79%35.03%42.56%-28.37%15.33%-15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between APWEX and RMLPX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between APWEX and RMLPX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APWEX vs. RMLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APWEX
APWEX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
APWEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APWEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
APWEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
APWEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
APWEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

RMLPX
RMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
RMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APWEX vs. RMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund (APWEX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APWEXRMLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.41

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

4.57

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.63

12.12

-2.50

APWEX vs. RMLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APWEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the RMLPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APWEX and RMLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APWEX vs. RMLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APWEX drawdown since its inception was -61.57%, smaller than the maximum RMLPX drawdown of -66.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APWEX and RMLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APWEXRMLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.57%

-66.95%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-9.09%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.02%

-18.75%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

-22.83%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

-2.14%

-5.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-10.19%

-6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

3.42%

+0.06%

Volatility

APWEX vs. RMLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund (APWEX) is 5.44%, while Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that APWEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APWEXRMLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

6.52%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

13.95%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

17.02%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.64%

21.36%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.79%

27.96%

-2.17%

APWEX vs. RMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APWEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RMLPX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

APWEX vs. RMLPX - Dividend Comparison

APWEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than RMLPX's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APWEX
Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund
0.72%0.45%1.80%1.54%1.95%1.44%1.54%2.57%1.26%0.43%0.97%0.67%
RMLPX
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund
4.77%6.38%7.63%6.49%7.08%8.89%13.48%7.25%5.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APWEX and RMLPX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMLPX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to APWEX (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APWEX dropped -61.57% vs RMLPX's -66.95%.

RMLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APWEX and RMLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer