APWEX vs. FRNW
APWEX (Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund) and FRNW (Fidelity Clean Energy ETF) are both funds - APWEX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Cavanal Hill funds, while FRNW is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, APWEX returned 26.62%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for FRNW. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APWEX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FRNW.
Performance
APWEX vs. FRNW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APWEX achieves a 31.95% return, which is significantly higher than FRNW's 25.64% return.
APWEX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 31.95%
- 6M
- 26.20%
- 1Y
- 46.90%
- 3Y*
- 26.62%
- 5Y*
- 19.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
FRNW
- 1D
- -5.76%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 25.64%
- 6M
- 23.94%
- 1Y
- 71.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APWEX vs. FRNW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APWEX Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund | 31.95% | 21.35% | 13.22% | 4.57% | 32.44% | -2.75% |
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | 25.64% | 53.20% | -21.11% | -19.64% | -11.46% | -2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between APWEX and FRNW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APWEX vs. FRNW — Risk / Return Rank
APWEX
FRNW
APWEX vs. FRNW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund (APWEX) and Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APWEX | FRNW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.43 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.64 | 6.34 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.97 | 19.56 | +2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APWEX | FRNW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 2.80 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.04 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
APWEX vs. FRNW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APWEX drawdown since its inception was -61.57%, roughly equal to the maximum FRNW drawdown of -59.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APWEX and FRNW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APWEX | FRNW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.57% | -59.37% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -11.58% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.02% | -45.27% | +22.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -9.27% | +6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -33.29% | +16.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 3.75% | -1.51% |
Volatility
APWEX vs. FRNW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund (APWEX) is 5.71%, while Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that APWEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRNW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APWEX | FRNW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 10.08% | -4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 18.82% | -5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.79% | 26.24% | -8.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 28.45% | -2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 28.45% | -2.61% |
APWEX vs. FRNW - Expense Ratio Comparison
APWEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FRNW's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
APWEX vs. FRNW - Dividend Comparison
APWEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than FRNW's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APWEX Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund | 0.57% | 0.45% | 1.80% | 1.54% | 1.95% | 1.44% | 1.54% | 2.57% | 1.26% | 0.43% | 0.97% | 0.67% |
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.30% | 0.69% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APWEX and FRNW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRNW has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to APWEX (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APWEX dropped -61.57% vs FRNW's -59.37%.
FRNW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APWEX and FRNW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer