APUE vs. TOLZ
APUE (ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APUE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by ActivePassive, while TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. APUE is actively managed, while TOLZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, APUE returned 22.12%/yr vs 14.17%/yr for TOLZ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APUE charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
APUE vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with APUE having a 10.99% return and TOLZ slightly higher at 11.31%.
APUE
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
APUE vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APUE ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF | 10.99% | 17.49% | 23.89% | 18.42% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.31% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between APUE and TOLZ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between APUE and TOLZ has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
APUE vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
APUE
TOLZ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
APUE
TOLZ
Financial Services
APUE
TOLZ
Consumer Cyclical
APUE
TOLZ
Communication Services
APUE
TOLZ
-
Industrials
APUE
TOLZ
Healthcare
APUE
TOLZ
-
Consumer Defensive
APUE
TOLZ
Energy
APUE
TOLZ
Basic Materials
APUE
TOLZ
-
Utilities
APUE
TOLZ
Real Estate
APUE
TOLZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APUE vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
APUE
TOLZ
APUE vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APUE | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.23 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.71 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.17 | 8.20 | +6.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APUE | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.36 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.41 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
APUE vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APUE drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APUE and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APUE | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.83% | -39.33% | +20.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -5.18% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.83% | -11.94% | -6.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -3.13% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -6.63% | +4.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.71% | +0.21% |
Volatility
APUE vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) is 2.84%, while ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that APUE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APUE | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 3.37% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 8.20% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 10.29% | +1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 13.99% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 16.29% | -1.64% |
APUE vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
APUE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
APUE vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
APUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than TOLZ's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APUE ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF | 0.75% | 0.83% | 0.79% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.66% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APUE and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOLZ has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to APUE (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APUE dropped -18.83% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.
On 3-year performance, APUE leads with 22.12% vs 14.17% for TOLZ. On fees, APUE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, APUE has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, APUE has performed better with a 22.12% return vs 14.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APUE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.75% for APUE.
APUE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for APUE and 0.46% for TOLZ.
APUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APUE and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer