APUE vs. HIMU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU).

APUE and HIMU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. APUE is an actively managed fund by ActivePassive. It was launched on May 2, 2023. HIMU is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Feb 7, 2025.

Performance

APUE vs. HIMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APUE vs. HIMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
APUE ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF	-3.14%	13.88%
HIMU iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF	0.17%	1.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APUE achieves a -3.14% return, which is significantly lower than HIMU's 0.17% return.

APUE

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -4.27%
• YTD: -3.14%
• 6M: -0.53%
• 1Y: 19.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HIMU

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 2.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APUE vs. HIMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

APUE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than HIMU's 0.42% expense ratio.

HIMU

iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF

APUE

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF

Return for Risk

APUE vs. HIMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APUE

APUE Risk / Return Rank: 61
APUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
APUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
APUE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
APUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
APUE Martin Ratio Rank: 68

HIMU

HIMU Risk / Return Rank: 19
HIMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HIMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HIMU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
HIMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
HIMU Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APUE vs. HIMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APUE	HIMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	0.31	+0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	0.46	+1.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.07	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	0.41	+1.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.68	1.34	+6.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APUE vs. HIMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APUE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the HIMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APUE and HIMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APUE	HIMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	0.31	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.15	+1.16

Correlation

The correlation between APUE and HIMU is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

APUE vs. HIMU - Dividend Comparison

APUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than HIMU's 5.22% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APUE ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF	0.86%	0.83%	0.79%	0.41%
HIMU iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF	5.22%	4.57%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

APUE vs. HIMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APUE drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, which is greater than HIMU's maximum drawdown of -8.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APUE and HIMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	APUE	HIMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.83%	-8.01%	-10.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.90%	-6.93%	-4.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.57%	-1.80%	-3.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.14%	-1.93%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.09%	+0.48%

Volatility

APUE vs. HIMU - Volatility Comparison

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) at 2.34%. This indicates that APUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APUE	HIMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.42%	2.34%	+3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.74%	2.96%	+6.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	8.09%	+9.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.82%	7.82%	+7.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.82%	7.82%	+7.00%