PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APUE vs. APCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APUE vs. APCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APUE achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than APCB's 0.29% return.


APUE

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.99%
6M
11.14%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
10Y*

APCB

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.29%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APUE vs. APCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
APUE
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
10.99%17.49%23.89%18.42%
APCB
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
0.29%6.87%1.45%1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between APUE and APCB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023

0.22

APUE vs. APCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
APUE
APCB

Technology

34.8%
100.0%

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Communication Services

10.5%

-

Industrials

9.4%

-

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Energy

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

APUE
34.8%
APCB
100.0%

Financial Services

APUE
11.9%
APCB

-

Consumer Cyclical

APUE
10.7%
APCB

-

Communication Services

APUE
10.5%
APCB

-

Industrials

APUE
9.4%
APCB

-

Healthcare

APUE
8.8%
APCB

-

Consumer Defensive

APUE
4.8%
APCB

-

Energy

APUE
3.3%
APCB

-

Basic Materials

APUE
2.1%
APCB

-

Utilities

APUE
1.9%
APCB

-

Real Estate

APUE
1.8%
APCB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APUE vs. APCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APUE
APUE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
APUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
APUE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
APUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
APUE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

APCB
APCB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
APCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
APCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
APCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
APCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APUE vs. APCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APUEAPCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

1.87

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.17

5.64

+9.52

APUE vs. APCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APUE Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the APCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APUE and APCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APUEAPCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.41

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

0.68

+0.93

Drawdowns

APUE vs. APCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APUE drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, which is greater than APCB's maximum drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APUE and APCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APUEAPCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-6.42%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-2.58%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.83%

-5.32%

-13.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-1.41%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-1.51%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

0.86%

+1.06%

Volatility

APUE vs. APCB - Volatility Comparison

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) at 1.22%. This indicates that APUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APUEAPCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

1.22%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

2.42%

+6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

3.43%

+8.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

4.84%

+9.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

4.84%

+9.81%

APUE vs. APCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

APUE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than APCB's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

APUE vs. APCB - Dividend Comparison

APUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than APCB's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
APCB
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
4.35%4.35%4.74%2.22%
APUE
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
0.75%0.83%0.79%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


APUE and APCB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APUE has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to APCB (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APUE dropped -18.83% vs APCB's -6.42%.

On 3-year performance, APUE leads with 22.12% vs 3.96% for APCB. On fees, APUE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, APCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, APUE has performed better with a 22.12% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APUE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for APCB.

APCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.75% for APUE.

APUE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while APCB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for APUE and 0.36% for APCB.

APUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APUE and APCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer