APSGX vs. SECUX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

APSGX (Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund) and SECUX (Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, APSGX returned 11.75%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for SECUX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. APSGX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for SECUX.

Performance

APSGX vs. SECUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund (APSGX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APSGX achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than SECUX's 14.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with APSGX having a 11.75% annualized return and SECUX not far behind at 11.50%.

APSGX

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: 13.20%
• 3Y*: 8.82%
• 5Y*: 2.82%
• 10Y*: 11.75%

SECUX

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 14.07%
• 6M: 11.69%
• 1Y: 16.19%
• 3Y*: 14.53%
• 5Y*: 4.40%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APSGX vs. SECUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
APSGX Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund	3.35%	5.74%	4.69%	26.12%	-23.71%	17.09%	44.67%	31.20%	-10.38%	26.60%
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund	14.07%	1.86%	14.29%	26.43%	-28.33%	13.39%	31.95%	32.44%	-7.76%	24.15%

Correlation

The correlation between APSGX and SECUX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012	0.94

The correlation between APSGX and SECUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

APSGX vs. SECUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APSGX

APSGX Risk / Return Rank: 14
APSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
APSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
APSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
APSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
APSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

SECUX

SECUX Risk / Return Rank: 23
SECUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SECUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SECUX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SECUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SECUX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APSGX vs. SECUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund (APSGX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APSGX	SECUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.05	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	1.57	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.19	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	1.90	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	6.34	-2.73

APSGX vs. SECUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the SECUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APSGX and SECUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APSGX vs. SECUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APSGX drawdown since its inception was -35.77%, smaller than the maximum SECUX drawdown of -71.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APSGX and SECUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	APSGX	SECUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.77%	-71.68%	+35.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.30%	-9.17%	-4.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.15%	-25.43%	-2.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.52%	-37.80%	+4.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.77%	-38.56%	+2.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-1.80%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.54%	-18.38%	+10.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	2.74%	+1.38%

Volatility

APSGX vs. SECUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund (APSGX) is 5.34%, while Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that APSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APSGX	SECUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.34%	6.09%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.99%	13.50%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.45%	16.59%	+0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.36%	21.54%	+0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.53%	21.21%	+1.32%

APSGX vs. SECUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APSGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SECUX's 1.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

APSGX vs. SECUX - Dividend Comparison

APSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, while SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APSGX Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund	2.35%	2.43%	2.91%	2.48%	16.83%	11.57%	21.15%	11.48%	28.25%	0.00%	0.28%	1.03%
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.31%	41.48%	6.54%	14.34%	2.18%	27.68%	12.89%	0.59%	14.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APSGX and SECUX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, APSGX and SECUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, APSGX or SECUX?

SECUX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to APSGX (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APSGX dropped -35.77% vs SECUX's -71.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SECUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.