APSGX vs. BLK
APSGX (Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fiera Capital, while BLK (BlackRock, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, APSGX returned 11.75%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for BLK. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
APSGX vs. BLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APSGX achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than BLK's -7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, APSGX has underperformed BLK with an annualized return of 11.75%, while BLK has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.
APSGX
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
BLK
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- -7.17%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- -0.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
APSGX vs. BLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APSGX Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 3.35% | 5.74% | 4.69% | 26.12% | -23.71% | 17.09% | 44.67% | 31.20% | -10.38% | 26.60% |
BLK BlackRock, Inc. | -7.17% | 6.55% | 29.29% | 17.86% | -20.40% | 29.39% | 47.21% | 31.87% | -21.59% | 38.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between APSGX and BLK is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012 | 0.67 |
The correlation between APSGX and BLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APSGX vs. BLK — Risk / Return Rank
APSGX
BLK
APSGX vs. BLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund (APSGX) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APSGX | BLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.02 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | -0.01 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | -0.02 | +3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APSGX vs. BLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APSGX drawdown since its inception was -35.77%, smaller than the maximum BLK drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APSGX and BLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APSGX | BLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.77% | -60.36% | +24.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -22.45% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.15% | -23.74% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.52% | -43.90% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.77% | -43.90% | +8.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -16.97% | +15.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -11.93% | +4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 10.27% | -6.15% |
Volatility
APSGX vs. BLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund (APSGX) is 5.34%, while BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) has a volatility of 8.09%. This indicates that APSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APSGX | BLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 8.09% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 21.05% | -8.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.45% | 26.21% | -8.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 26.81% | -4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.53% | 27.70% | -5.17% |
Dividends
APSGX vs. BLK - Dividend Comparison
APSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than BLK's 2.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APSGX Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 2.35% | 2.43% | 2.91% | 2.48% | 16.83% | 11.57% | 21.15% | 11.48% | 28.25% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 1.03% |
BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 2.23% | 1.95% | 1.99% | 2.46% | 2.75% | 1.80% | 2.01% | 2.63% | 3.08% | 1.95% | 2.41% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APSGX and BLK have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLK has higher volatility (8.09%) compared to APSGX (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APSGX dropped -35.77% vs BLK's -60.36%.
APSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APSGX and BLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer