PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APSGX vs. FSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APSGX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund (APSGX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APSGX achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than FSMAX's 13.74% return. Over the past 10 years, APSGX has underperformed FSMAX with an annualized return of 11.06%, while FSMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.06% annualized return.


APSGX

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.79%
YTD
1.99%
6M
0.31%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
11.06%

FSMAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.43%
YTD
13.74%
6M
11.91%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
12.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APSGX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APSGX
Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund
1.99%5.74%4.69%26.12%-23.71%17.09%44.67%31.20%-10.38%26.60%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
13.74%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between APSGX and FSMAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.94

The correlation between APSGX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APSGX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APSGX
APSGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
APSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
APSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
APSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
APSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APSGX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund (APSGX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APSGXFSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

2.82

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

9.96

-6.90

APSGX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APSGX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APSGXFSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.69

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.29

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.40

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.46

+0.08

Drawdowns

APSGX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APSGX drawdown since its inception was -35.77%, smaller than the maximum FSMAX drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APSGX and FSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APSGXFSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.77%

-50.55%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-10.26%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.15%

-26.82%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.52%

-36.31%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.77%

-50.55%

+14.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-1.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-12.16%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

2.90%

+1.21%

Volatility

APSGX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund (APSGX) is 4.08%, while Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that APSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APSGXFSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

4.84%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

12.48%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

17.20%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.28%

22.33%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

30.23%

-7.69%

APSGX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APSGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

APSGX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

APSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APSGX
Fiera Capital Small/Mid-Cap Growth Fund
2.38%2.43%2.91%2.48%16.83%11.57%21.15%11.48%28.25%0.00%0.28%1.03%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, APSGX and FSMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSMAX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to APSGX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APSGX dropped -35.77% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

FSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APSGX and FSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer