PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRW vs. FLJJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

APRW vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

APRW vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRW achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than FLJJ's -2.00% return.


APRW

1D
0.16%
1M
0.58%
YTD
1.48%
6M
3.35%
1Y
10.24%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*

FLJJ

1D
0.94%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
-2.00%
6M
0.41%
1Y
11.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


APRW vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APRW and FLJJ have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Return for Risk

APRW vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRW
APRW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJJ
FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRW vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APRWFLJJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

1.82

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

2.69

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.38

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

3.07

-1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.27

12.91

+0.36

APRW vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRW and FLJJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRWFLJJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.82

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

1.71

-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between APRW and FLJJ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

APRW vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRW nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.67%
FLJJ
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

APRW vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRW drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRW and FLJJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


APRWFLJJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-6.91%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.62%

-3.86%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.95%

+2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.15%

-0.82%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.92%

-0.10%

Volatility

APRW vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) is 0.71%, while Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that APRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


APRWFLJJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

2.09%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

3.45%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93%

6.41%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.73%

6.31%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.47%

6.31%

+0.16%