APRT vs. PBFB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APRT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF) and PBFB (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APRT returned 19.10% vs 13.63% for PBFB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. APRT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFB.

Performance

APRT vs. PBFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRT achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly higher than PBFB's 4.68% return.

APRT

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 9.89%
• 6M: 10.85%
• 1Y: 19.10%
• 3Y*: 14.42%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: —

PBFB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 13.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRT vs. PBFB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
APRT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF	9.89%	7.99%	13.00%
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February	4.68%	9.86%	10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between APRT and PBFB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.88

The correlation between APRT and PBFB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

APRT vs. PBFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRT

APRT Risk / Return Rank: 97
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

PBFB

PBFB Risk / Return Rank: 86
PBFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PBFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PBFB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PBFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PBFB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRT vs. PBFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APRT	PBFB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.83	2.87	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.77	4.27	+2.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.97	1.61	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.06	3.61	+8.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	65.68	19.17	+46.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APRT vs. PBFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRT Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is higher than the PBFB Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRT and PBFB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APRT	PBFB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.83	2.87	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	1.67	-0.56

Drawdowns

APRT vs. PBFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRT drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, which is greater than PBFB's maximum drawdown of -8.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRT and PBFB.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRT	PBFB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.98%	-8.65%	-6.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.59%	-3.79%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.15%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-0.60%	-1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.29%	0.71%	-0.42%

Volatility

APRT vs. PBFB - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) at 0.75%. This indicates that APRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APRT	PBFB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.01%	0.75%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.99%	3.71%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.02%	4.77%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.78%	6.39%	+4.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.29%	6.39%	+3.90%

APRT vs. PBFB - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFB's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

APRT vs. PBFB - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRT nor PBFB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APRT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.67%
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APRT and PBFB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, APRT and PBFB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, APRT or PBFB?

APRT has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to PBFB (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRT dropped -14.98% vs PBFB's -8.65%.

Which ETF is better, APRT or PBFB?

On 1-year performance, APRT leads with 19.10% vs 13.63% for PBFB. On fees, PBFB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PBFB has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APRT or PBFB?

Over the 1-year period, APRT has performed better with a 19.10% return vs 13.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APRT or PBFB?

PBFB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for APRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APRT or PBFB?

APRT and PBFB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between APRT and PBFB?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for APRT and 0.50% for PBFB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.83 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.