PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRT vs. LAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRT vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRT achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly higher than LAPR's 3.32% return.


APRT

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.07%
YTD
9.89%
6M
10.85%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*

LAPR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.72%
YTD
3.32%
6M
3.77%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRT vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APRT and LAPR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.72

The correlation between APRT and LAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRT vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRT
APRT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LAPR
LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRT vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APRTLAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.97

2.93

-0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.06

29.36

-17.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

65.68

144.96

-79.28

APRT vs. LAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRT Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is lower than the LAPR Sharpe Ratio of 5.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRT and LAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRTLAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83

5.58

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

1.97

-0.87

Drawdowns

APRT vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRT drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, which is greater than LAPR's maximum drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRT and LAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRTLAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.98%

-3.81%

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-0.24%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.12%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-0.11%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

0.05%

+0.24%

Volatility

APRT vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) at 0.32%. This indicates that APRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRTLAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.32%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.99%

1.00%

+2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.02%

1.27%

+3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.78%

3.30%

+7.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.29%

3.30%

+6.99%

APRT vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than LAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRT vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison

APRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
5.53%5.40%4.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APRT and LAPR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APRT has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to LAPR (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRT dropped -14.98% vs LAPR's -3.81%.

On 1-year performance, APRT leads with 19.10% vs 7.01% for LAPR. On fees, APRT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, LAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, APRT has performed better with a 19.10% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LAPR.

LAPR has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 0.00% for APRT.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for APRT and 0.79% for LAPR.

LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 3.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRT and LAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer