PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRT vs. DMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

APRT vs. DMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

APRT vs. DMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
2.08%7.99%15.15%22.13%-6.41%10.47%
DMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March
1.79%9.13%12.74%12.25%-5.48%7.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRT achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly higher than DMAR's 1.79% return.


APRT

1D
2.34%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.40%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*

DMAR

1D
1.41%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.79%
6M
4.00%
1Y
12.53%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


APRT vs. DMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

APRT vs. DMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRT
APRT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAR
DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRT vs. DMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APRTDMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

1.66

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

2.45

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.51

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.08

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.67

13.69

-2.01

APRT vs. DMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the DMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRT and DMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRTDMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.66

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

1.00

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.03

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between APRT and DMAR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

APRT vs. DMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRT nor DMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%
DMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

APRT vs. DMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRT drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, which is greater than DMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRT and DMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


APRTDMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.98%

-9.84%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-6.15%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.98%

-9.84%

-5.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-1.91%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

0.93%

+0.39%

Volatility

APRT vs. DMAR - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) at 1.94%. This indicates that APRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


APRTDMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

1.94%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

2.71%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

7.59%

+3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.82%

7.06%

+3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.40%

7.05%

+3.35%