APRQ vs. XAPR
APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) and XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. APRQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XAPR.
Performance
APRQ vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APRQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAPR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 8.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRQ vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April | 3.06% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRQ vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank
APRQ
XAPR
APRQ vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRQ | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.90 | — |
Drawdowns
APRQ vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum XAPR drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and XAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRQ | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -6.18% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.18% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility
APRQ vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRQ | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 2.05% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 6.18% | -6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 6.18% | -6.18% |
APRQ vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRQ vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither APRQ nor XAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, APRQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.
APRQ and XAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRQ and 0.85% for XAPR.
Find the right allocation for APRQ and XAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer