APRQ vs. JPO
APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) and JPO (YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. APRQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for JPO.
Performance
APRQ vs. JPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APRQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPO
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -4.00%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 12.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRQ vs. JPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF | -2.99% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRQ vs. JPO — Risk / Return Rank
APRQ
JPO
APRQ vs. JPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRQ | JPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.70 | — |
Drawdowns
APRQ vs. JPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum JPO drawdown of -24.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and JPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRQ | JPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -24.80% | +24.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.81% | +6.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -4.59% | +4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.68% | — |
Volatility
APRQ vs. JPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRQ | JPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 18.63% | -18.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 19.06% | -19.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 19.06% | -19.06% |
APRQ vs. JPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than JPO's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRQ vs. JPO - Dividend Comparison
APRQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF | 34.21% | 34.13% | 25.15% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, APRQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for JPO.
JPO has the higher dividend yield at 34.21%, compared with 0.00% for APRQ.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRQ and 1.19% for JPO.
Find the right allocation for APRQ and JPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer