APRQ vs. GFEB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) and GFEB (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds. APRQ is actively managed, while GFEB is passively managed. APRQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GFEB.

Performance

APRQ vs. GFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

APRQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GFEB

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 5.83%
• 6M: 6.55%
• 1Y: 15.17%
• 3Y*: 13.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRQ vs. GFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February	4.64%

APRQ vs. GFEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	APRQ	GFEB
Technology	32.0%	36.2%
Financial Services	13.7%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	10.1%
Healthcare	10.5%	8.4%
Communication Services	9.9%	10.9%
Industrials	7.4%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	4.9%
Energy	3.2%	3.5%
Utilities	2.5%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.1%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.8%

Return for Risk

APRQ vs. GFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFEB

GFEB Risk / Return Rank: 84
GFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
GFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRQ vs. GFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APRQ	GFEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.79	—

Drawdowns

APRQ vs. GFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum GFEB drawdown of -9.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and GFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRQ	GFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-9.63%	+9.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.46%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.21%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-0.69%	+0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	APRQ	GFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	5.51%	-5.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	7.57%	-7.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	7.57%	-7.57%

APRQ vs. GFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GFEB's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

APRQ vs. GFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRQ nor GFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, APRQ or GFEB?

On fees, APRQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, APRQ or GFEB?

APRQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APRQ or GFEB?

APRQ and GFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between APRQ and GFEB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRQ and 0.85% for GFEB.