APRP vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

APRP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APRP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by PGIM, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APRP returned 15.50% vs 120.64% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. APRP charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

APRP vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with APRP having a 9.79% return and WNTR slightly higher at 10.13%.

APRP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: 9.36%
• YTD: 9.79%
• 1Y: 15.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 18.08%
• 6M: 14.43%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 120.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRP vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	9.79%	9.81%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.13%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between APRP and WNTR is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.48

Return for Risk

APRP vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRP

APRP Risk / Return Rank: 78
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 70
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRP vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APRP	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.26	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.47	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.34	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	2.84	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.44	7.31	+25.13

APRP vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRP Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRP and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APRP vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRP drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRP and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRP	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.66%	-42.65%	+28.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.07%	-42.65%	+36.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-10.15%	+9.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.21%	-20.53%	+19.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	16.58%	-16.10%

Volatility

APRP vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) is 8.44%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.84%. This indicates that APRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APRP	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.44%	18.84%	-10.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.99%	47.46%	-38.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.32%	53.83%	-44.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.80%	53.56%	-42.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.80%	53.56%	-42.76%

APRP vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

APRP vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

APRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.14%.

Position	TTM	2025
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	102.14%	58.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APRP and WNTR in my portfolio?

APRP and WNTR have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APRP or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to APRP (8.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRP dropped -13.66% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, APRP or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 15.50% for APRP. On fees, APRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, APRP has been the lower-risk option at 8.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APRP or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 15.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APRP or WNTR?

APRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APRP or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 0.00% for APRP.

What is the main difference between APRP and WNTR?

APRP is categorized as Options Trading, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for APRP and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.