APRP vs. PBFR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

APRP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April) and PBFR (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APRP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by PGIM, while PBFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APRP returned 16.46% vs 11.38% for PBFR. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

APRP vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRP achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than PBFR's 5.89% return.

APRP

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 10.02%
• YTD: 10.78%
• 1Y: 16.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.40%

PBFR

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.01%
• 6M: 5.06%
• YTD: 5.89%
• 1Y: 11.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	$92.96K	$114.08K	$127.84K
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	$1.32M	$1.10M	$1.64M

APRP vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	10.78%	7.80%	7.14%
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	5.89%	10.44%	5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between APRP and PBFR is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024	0.89

The correlation between APRP and PBFR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

APRP vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APRP

APRP Risk / Return Rank: 82
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

PBFR

PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 93
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APRP vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APRP	PBFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	2.60	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.78	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.55	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	4.06	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	33.90	20.65	+13.25

APRP vs. PBFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRP Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the PBFR Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRP and PBFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APRP vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRP drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRP and PBFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRP	PBFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.66%	-8.50%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.07%	-2.82%	-3.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.19%	-0.61%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.49%	0.55%	-0.06%

Volatility

APRP vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 1.33%. This indicates that APRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APRP	PBFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	1.33%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.06%	3.65%	+5.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.38%	4.41%	+4.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.70%	6.74%	+3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.70%	6.74%	+3.96%

APRP vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APRP and PBFR have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

APRP vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison

APRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APRP and PBFR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, APRP and PBFR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, APRP or PBFR?

APRP has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to PBFR (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRP dropped -13.66% vs PBFR's -8.50%.

Which ETF is better, APRP or PBFR?

On 1-year performance, APRP leads with 16.46% vs 11.38% for PBFR. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APRP or PBFR?

Over the 1-year period, APRP has performed better with a 16.46% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APRP or PBFR?

APRP and PBFR have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APRP or PBFR?

PBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for APRP.

What is the main difference between APRP and PBFR?

APRP is categorized as Options Trading, while PBFR is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.