APRP vs. AMZY
APRP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April) and AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APRP returned 18.46% vs 16.78% for AMZY. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. APRP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMZY.
Performance
APRP vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APRP achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than AMZY's 6.01% return.
APRP
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZY
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 6.01%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRP vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April | 9.54% | 7.80% | 10.28% |
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF | 6.01% | 10.39% | 13.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between APRP and AMZY is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between APRP and AMZY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRP vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank
APRP
AMZY
APRP vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APRP | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.29 | 0.72 | +3.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.33 | 1.09 | +6.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.08 | 1.15 | +0.94 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.17 | 0.90 | +16.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 76.71 | 2.25 | +74.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRP | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.29 | 0.72 | +3.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 0.99 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
APRP vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRP drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, smaller than the maximum AMZY drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRP and AMZY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRP | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.66% | -23.70% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.09% | -19.61% | +18.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.34% | +5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -5.32% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 7.86% | -7.62% |
Volatility
APRP vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) is 1.17%, while YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that APRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRP | AMZY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 5.75% | -4.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.36% | 15.91% | -12.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 23.48% | -19.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 25.04% | -15.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 25.04% | -15.54% |
APRP vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRP vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison
APRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF | 56.39% | 52.59% | 47.91% | 9.90% |
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APRP and AMZY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZY has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to APRP (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRP dropped -13.66% vs AMZY's -23.70%.
On 1-year performance, APRP leads with 18.46% vs 16.78% for AMZY. On fees, APRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, APRP has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, APRP has performed better with a 18.46% return vs 16.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZY.
AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 56.39%, compared with 0.00% for APRP.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for APRP and 0.99% for AMZY.
APRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APRP and AMZY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer