PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRJ vs. XAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRJ vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRJ achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than XAPR's 3.39% return.


APRJ

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.64%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
10Y*

XAPR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.66%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.05%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRJ vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APRJ and XAPR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.56

The correlation between APRJ and XAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRJ vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRJ
APRJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRJ vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APRJXAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.63

4.31

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

9.47

7.30

+2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.20

2.06

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

34.55

13.37

+21.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

103.47

70.60

+32.87

APRJ vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRJ Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is comparable to the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRJ and XAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRJXAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63

4.31

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.80

1.88

-0.08

Drawdowns

APRJ vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRJ drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum XAPR drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRJ and XAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRJXAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-6.18%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-0.66%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.16%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-0.18%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.12%

-0.05%

Volatility

APRJ vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) is 0.47%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that APRJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRJXAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.75%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

1.31%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50%

2.05%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.63%

6.18%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.63%

6.18%

-2.55%

APRJ vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRJ vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, while XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


APRJ and XAPR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAPR has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to APRJ (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRJ dropped -4.68% vs XAPR's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, XAPR leads with 8.79% vs 6.91% for APRJ. On fees, APRJ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XAPR has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRJ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

APRJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRJ and 0.85% for XAPR.

APRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 4.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRJ and XAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer