APRJ vs. XAPR
APRJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April) and XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APRJ returned 6.91% vs 8.79% for XAPR. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. APRJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XAPR.
Performance
APRJ vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APRJ achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than XAPR's 3.39% return.
APRJ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 6.91%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAPR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- 8.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRJ vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April | 3.18% | 5.71% | 5.13% |
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April | 3.39% | 12.57% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between APRJ and XAPR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between APRJ and XAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APRJ vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank
APRJ
XAPR
APRJ vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APRJ | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.63 | 4.31 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 9.47 | 7.30 | +2.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.20 | 2.06 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 34.55 | 13.37 | +21.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 103.47 | 70.60 | +32.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APRJ | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.63 | 4.31 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.80 | 1.88 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
APRJ vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APRJ drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum XAPR drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRJ and XAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APRJ | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -6.18% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -0.66% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.16% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -0.18% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 0.12% | -0.05% |
Volatility
APRJ vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) is 0.47%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that APRJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APRJ | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 0.75% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.14% | 1.31% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 2.05% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 6.18% | -2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 6.18% | -2.55% |
APRJ vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
APRJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
APRJ vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison
APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, while XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April | 5.27% | 5.46% | 5.88% | 4.88% |
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APRJ and XAPR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAPR has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to APRJ (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRJ dropped -4.68% vs XAPR's -6.18%.
On 1-year performance, XAPR leads with 8.79% vs 6.91% for APRJ. On fees, APRJ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAPR has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APRJ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.
APRJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRJ and 0.85% for XAPR.
APRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 4.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APRJ and XAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer