APRJ vs. ISWN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APRJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April) and ISWN (Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF) are both Options Trading funds. APRJ is actively managed, while ISWN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, APRJ returned 6.35%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for ISWN. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APRJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ISWN.

Performance

APRJ vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRJ achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 4.28% return.

APRJ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 6.91%
• 3Y*: 6.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISWN

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 6M: 4.94%
• 1Y: 13.27%
• 3Y*: 8.12%
• 5Y*: -0.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRJ vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April	3.18%	5.71%	6.24%	5.38%
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	4.28%	23.23%	-3.96%	0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between APRJ and ISWN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023	0.31

The correlation between APRJ and ISWN shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

APRJ vs. ISWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	APRJ	ISWN
Technology	33.6%	10.3%
Financial Services	12.4%	1.6%
Communication Services	10.5%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	7.7%
Healthcare	9.5%	10.6%
Industrials	8.5%	19.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	6.7%
Energy	4.0%	4.0%
Utilities	2.5%	4.0%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.9%	5.9%

Return for Risk

APRJ vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRJ

APRJ Risk / Return Rank: 98
APRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
APRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
APRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
APRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

ISWN

ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 30
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRJ vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APRJ	ISWN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.63	1.09	+3.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	9.47	1.60	+7.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.20	1.20	+1.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	34.55	1.38	+33.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	103.47	4.67	+98.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APRJ vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRJ Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is higher than the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRJ and ISWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APRJ	ISWN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.63	1.09	+3.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.80	0.01	+1.79

Drawdowns

APRJ vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRJ drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRJ and ISWN.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRJ	ISWN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-32.35%	+27.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.20%	-9.63%	+9.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.68%	-13.77%	+9.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-4.03%	+3.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.12%	-16.17%	+16.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	2.85%	-2.78%

Volatility

APRJ vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) is 0.47%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that APRJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APRJ	ISWN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.47%	4.67%	-4.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.14%	10.10%	-8.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50%	12.20%	-10.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.63%	11.67%	-8.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.63%	11.57%	-7.94%

APRJ vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

APRJ vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than ISWN's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April	5.27%	5.46%	5.88%	4.88%	0.00%	0.00%
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	2.82%	2.89%	3.27%	2.91%	2.00%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APRJ and ISWN in my portfolio?

APRJ and ISWN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APRJ or ISWN?

ISWN has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to APRJ (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRJ dropped -4.68% vs ISWN's -32.35%.

Which ETF is better, APRJ or ISWN?

On 3-year performance, ISWN leads with 8.12% vs 6.35% for APRJ. On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, APRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APRJ or ISWN?

Over the 3-year period, ISWN has performed better with a 8.12% return vs 6.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APRJ or ISWN?

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APRJ or ISWN?

APRJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 2.82% for ISWN.

What is the main difference between APRJ and ISWN?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRJ and 0.49% for ISWN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.