PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRJ vs. AAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRJ vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRJ achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than AAPR's 3.82% return.


APRJ

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.64%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
10Y*

AAPR

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.68%
YTD
3.82%
6M
4.48%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRJ vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APRJ and AAPR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.53

The correlation between APRJ and AAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRJ vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRJ
APRJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRJ vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APRJAAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.63

4.18

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

9.47

7.21

+2.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.20

1.99

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

34.55

12.12

+22.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

103.47

62.99

+40.48

APRJ vs. AAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRJ Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is comparable to the AAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRJ and AAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRJAAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63

4.18

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.80

1.73

+0.07

Drawdowns

APRJ vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRJ drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum AAPR drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRJ and AAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRJAAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-5.99%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-0.81%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.15%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-0.45%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.16%

-0.09%

Volatility

APRJ vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) is 0.47%, while Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that APRJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRJAAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.68%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

1.57%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50%

2.36%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.63%

4.81%

-1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.63%

4.81%

-1.18%

APRJ vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APRJ and AAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

APRJ vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison

APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, while AAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


APRJ and AAPR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPR has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to APRJ (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRJ dropped -4.68% vs AAPR's -5.99%.

On 1-year performance, AAPR leads with 9.83% vs 6.91% for APRJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, APRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPR has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRJ and AAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

APRJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 0.00% for AAPR.

APRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 4.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRJ and AAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer