APRD vs. JULQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

APRD (Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April) and JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

APRD vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

APRD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRD vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
APRD Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%

APRD vs. JULQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	APRD	JULQ
Technology	32.0%	31.7%
Financial Services	13.7%	14.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	10.4%
Healthcare	10.5%	10.9%
Communication Services	9.9%	9.5%
Industrials	7.4%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	6.2%
Energy	3.2%	3.2%
Utilities	2.5%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.8%

Return for Risk

APRD vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

APRD vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRD drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRD and JULQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRD	JULQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	APRD	JULQ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

APRD vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APRD and JULQ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

APRD vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRD nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, APRD or JULQ?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, APRD or JULQ?

APRD and JULQ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APRD or JULQ?

APRD and JULQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.