PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRB vs. SMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRB vs. SMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May (SMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRB achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than SMAY's 8.20% return.


APRB

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.19%
YTD
4.53%
6M
4.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMAY

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.87%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.79%
1Y
18.67%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRB vs. SMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APRB and SMAY is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRB vs. SMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SMAY
SMAY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRB vs. SMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May (SMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APRBSMAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.96

APRB vs. SMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APRB vs. SMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, smaller than the maximum SMAY drawdown of -14.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRB and SMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRBSMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-14.44%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.52%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-2.51%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

Volatility

APRB vs. SMAY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRBSMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.97%

7.62%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

10.23%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.97%

10.23%

-4.26%

APRB vs. SMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SMAY's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRB vs. SMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRB nor SMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


APRB and SMAY have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMAY.

APRB and SMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for APRB and 0.90% for SMAY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRB and SMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer