PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRB vs. SEPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRB vs. SEPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRB achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than SEPU's 7.10% return.


APRB

1D
0.30%
1M
0.71%
6M
4.72%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

SEPU

1D
0.83%
1M
0.20%
6M
5.98%
YTD
7.10%
1Y
15.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.58K$46.66K$43.31K
$330.11K$308.66K$602.65K

APRB vs. SEPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APRB and SEPU is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRB vs. SEPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APRB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SEPU
SEPU Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SEPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPU Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APRB vs. SEPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APRBSEPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

APRB vs. SEPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APRB vs. SEPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, smaller than the maximum SEPU drawdown of -11.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRB and SEPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRBSEPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-11.76%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.74%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-1.77%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

Volatility

APRB vs. SEPU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRBSEPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.72%

10.71%

-4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

11.16%

-5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.72%

11.16%

-5.44%

APRB vs. SEPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SEPU's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRB vs. SEPU - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRB nor SEPU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, APRB and SEPU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SEPU.

APRB and SEPU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for APRB and 0.74% for SEPU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRB and SEPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer