PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRB vs. NSEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRB vs. NSEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - September (NSEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRB achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly lower than NSEP's 6.61% return.


APRB

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.69%
YTD
4.77%
6M
5.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NSEP

1D
0.00%
1M
1.85%
YTD
6.61%
6M
6.79%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRB vs. NSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APRB and NSEP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRB vs. NSEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRB

NSEP
NSEP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRB vs. NSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - September (NSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APRB vs. NSEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRBNSEPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

1.50

+0.51

Drawdowns

APRB vs. NSEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, smaller than the maximum NSEP drawdown of -12.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRB and NSEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRBNSEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-12.31%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.06%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-1.09%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

Volatility

APRB vs. NSEP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRBNSEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.98%

6.76%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.98%

10.47%

-4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.98%

10.47%

-4.49%

APRB vs. NSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NSEP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRB vs. NSEP - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRB nor NSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


APRB and NSEP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NSEP.

APRB and NSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for APRB and 0.79% for NSEP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRB and NSEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer