PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRB vs. CPNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRB vs. CPNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRB achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly higher than CPNQ's 3.12% return.


APRB

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.69%
YTD
4.77%
6M
5.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPNQ

1D
0.03%
1M
1.03%
YTD
3.12%
6M
3.32%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRB vs. CPNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APRB and CPNQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRB vs. CPNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRB

CPNQ
CPNQ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CPNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CPNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRB vs. CPNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APRB vs. CPNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRBCPNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

2.24

-0.24

Drawdowns

APRB vs. CPNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, which is greater than CPNQ's maximum drawdown of -3.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRB and CPNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRBCPNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-3.52%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.04%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-0.43%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

Volatility

APRB vs. CPNQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRBCPNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.98%

2.64%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.98%

3.37%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.98%

3.37%

+2.61%

APRB vs. CPNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CPNQ's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRB vs. CPNQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRB nor CPNQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


APRB and CPNQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPNQ.

APRB and CPNQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for APRB and 0.69% for CPNQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRB and CPNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer