PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APO vs. XPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APO vs. XPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APO achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly lower than XPO's 68.00% return. Over the past 10 years, APO has underperformed XPO with an annualized return of 29.16%, while XPO has yielded a comparatively higher 37.55% annualized return.


APO

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-6.75%
6M
-8.82%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
20.72%
10Y*
29.16%

XPO

1D
0.30%
1M
11.80%
YTD
68.00%
6M
53.18%
1Y
89.56%
3Y*
66.73%
5Y*
34.58%
10Y*
37.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APO vs. XPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
-6.75%-11.12%79.87%49.44%-9.59%53.25%8.00%106.46%-22.03%85.29%
XPO
XPO Logistics, Inc.
68.00%3.63%49.73%163.11%-27.64%11.60%49.56%39.73%-37.72%112.21%

Correlation

The correlation between APO and XPO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011

0.40

The correlation between APO and XPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APO:

$79.66B

XPO:

$27.17B

EPS

APO:

$3.58

XPO:

$2.92

PE Ratio

APO:

37.38

XPO:

78.24

PEG Ratio

APO:

0.10

XPO:

2.94

PS Ratio

APO:

2.71

XPO:

3.28

PB Ratio

APO:

4.29

XPO:

14.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

APO:

$29.68B

XPO:

$8.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APO:

$26.52B

XPO:

$772.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

APO:

$9.28B

XPO:

$1.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APO vs. XPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APO
APO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
APO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
APO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
APO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
APO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

XPO
XPO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APO vs. XPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APOXPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.32

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

5.58

-5.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

13.27

-13.36

APO vs. XPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APO Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the XPO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APO and XPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APO vs. XPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APO drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, smaller than the maximum XPO drawdown of -82.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APO and XPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APOXPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.99%

-82.85%

+25.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.97%

-15.63%

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.82%

-42.19%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.82%

-53.17%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.48%

-64.48%

+11.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.36%

-0.02%

-23.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.39%

-30.26%

+13.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.70%

6.57%

+10.13%

Volatility

APO vs. XPO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) is 8.49%, while XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that APO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APOXPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.49%

11.60%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.89%

32.18%

-5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.44%

43.80%

-8.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.11%

46.98%

-9.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.83%

47.82%

-9.99%

Dividends

APO vs. XPO - Dividend Comparison

APO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while XPO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
1.56%1.38%1.10%1.81%2.51%2.90%4.72%4.23%7.86%5.53%6.46%12.91%
XPO
XPO Logistics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

APO vs. XPO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apollo Global Management, Inc. and XPO Logistics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
4.93B
2.10B
(APO) Total Revenue
(XPO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APO vs. XPO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Apollo Global Management, Inc. and XPO Logistics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
0
Portfolio components
APO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.93B and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

XPO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

APO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

XPO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 174.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.

APO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a net income of -1.91B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of -38.7%.

XPO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APO and XPO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XPO has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to APO (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APO dropped -56.99% vs XPO's -82.85%.

XPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APO and XPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer