PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APO vs. PFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APO vs. PFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APO achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly lower than PFG's 28.11% return. Over the past 10 years, APO has outperformed PFG with an annualized return of 29.16%, while PFG has yielded a comparatively lower 14.54% annualized return.


APO

1D
-0.02%
1M
2.16%
YTD
-6.75%
6M
-8.82%
1Y
-1.51%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
20.72%
10Y*
29.16%

PFG

1D
1.30%
1M
11.53%
YTD
28.11%
6M
25.65%
1Y
49.57%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
15.41%
10Y*
14.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APO vs. PFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
-6.75%-11.12%79.87%49.44%-9.59%53.25%8.00%106.46%-22.03%85.29%
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
28.11%18.38%1.87%-2.83%20.10%51.35%-5.19%29.71%-34.96%25.52%

Correlation

The correlation between APO and PFG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011

0.48

The correlation between APO and PFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APO:

$79.66B

PFG:

$24.48B

EPS

APO:

$3.58

PFG:

$6.97

PE Ratio

APO:

37.38

PFG:

15.93

PEG Ratio

APO:

0.10

PFG:

0.23

PS Ratio

APO:

2.71

PFG:

2.06

PB Ratio

APO:

4.29

PFG:

2.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

APO:

$29.68B

PFG:

$12.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APO:

$26.52B

PFG:

$5.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

APO:

$9.28B

PFG:

$1.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APO vs. PFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APO
APO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
APO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
APO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
APO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
APO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PFG
PFG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APO vs. PFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APOPFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.38

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

4.16

-4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

13.49

-13.58

APO vs. PFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APO Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the PFG Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APO and PFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APO vs. PFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APO drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, smaller than the maximum PFG drawdown of -91.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APO and PFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APOPFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.99%

-91.50%

+34.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.97%

-11.96%

-23.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.82%

-22.43%

-20.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.82%

-29.32%

-13.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.48%

-64.73%

+11.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.36%

0.00%

-23.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.39%

-21.84%

+5.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.70%

3.69%

+13.01%

Volatility

APO vs. PFG - Volatility Comparison

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) at 5.39%. This indicates that APO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APOPFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.49%

5.39%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.89%

15.57%

+11.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.44%

21.87%

+13.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.11%

26.64%

+10.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.83%

31.95%

+5.88%

Dividends

APO vs. PFG - Dividend Comparison

APO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than PFG's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
1.56%1.38%1.10%1.81%2.51%2.90%4.72%4.23%7.86%5.53%6.46%12.91%
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
2.87%3.49%3.68%3.30%3.05%3.37%4.52%3.96%4.75%2.65%2.78%3.33%

Financials

APO vs. PFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Principal Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
4.93B
135.60M
(APO) Total Revenue
(PFG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


APO and PFG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APO has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to PFG (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APO dropped -56.99% vs PFG's -91.50%.

PFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APO and PFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer