APO vs. BN
APO (Apollo Global Management, Inc.) and BN (Brookfield Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, APO returned 29.16%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for BN. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APO vs. BN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APO achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly lower than BN's -1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, APO has outperformed BN with an annualized return of 29.16%, while BN has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.
APO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 6M
- -8.82%
- 1Y
- -1.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 20.72%
- 10Y*
- 29.16%
BN
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 15.16%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
APO vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | -6.75% | -11.12% | 79.87% | 49.44% | -9.59% | 53.25% | 8.00% | 106.46% | -22.03% | 85.29% |
BN Brookfield Corporation | -1.31% | 20.54% | 44.18% | 28.60% | -34.80% | 49.30% | 8.99% | 52.68% | -10.65% | 33.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between APO and BN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011 | 0.48 |
The correlation between APO and BN shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
APO:
$79.66B
BN:
$107.01B
APO:
$3.58
BN:
$0.56
APO:
37.38
BN:
80.05
APO:
0.10
BN:
175.42
APO:
2.71
BN:
1.40
APO:
4.29
BN:
2.50
APO:
$29.68B
BN:
$76.58B
APO:
$26.52B
BN:
$27.02B
APO:
$9.28B
BN:
$31.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APO vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank
APO
BN
APO vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Brookfield Corporation (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APO | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.11 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 0.69 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 1.90 | -1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APO vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APO drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, smaller than the maximum BN drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APO and BN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APO | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.99% | -82.22% | +25.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.97% | -22.05% | -12.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.82% | -27.84% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.82% | -41.85% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.48% | -51.42% | -2.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.36% | -7.89% | -15.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.39% | -28.51% | +12.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.70% | 7.99% | +8.71% |
Volatility
APO vs. BN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) is 8.49%, while Brookfield Corporation (BN) has a volatility of 10.05%. This indicates that APO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APO | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | 10.05% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.89% | 22.60% | +4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.44% | 28.82% | +6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.11% | 31.27% | +5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.83% | 30.17% | +7.66% |
Dividends
APO vs. BN - Dividend Comparison
APO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than BN's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.10% | 1.81% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 4.72% | 4.23% | 7.86% | 5.53% | 6.46% | 12.91% |
BN Brookfield Corporation | 0.55% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.70% | 1.44% | 1.12% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.50% |
Financials
APO vs. BN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Brookfield Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APO vs. BN - Profitability Comparison
APO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.93B and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
BN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.43B and revenue of 18.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
APO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
BN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported an operating income of 4.39B and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
APO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a net income of -1.91B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of -38.7%.
BN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a net income of 100.59M and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
APO and BN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BN has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to APO (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APO dropped -56.99% vs BN's -82.22%.
BN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APO and BN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer