APMU vs. MEAR
APMU (ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF) and MEAR (iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, APMU returned 3.03%/yr vs 3.58%/yr for MEAR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APMU charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MEAR.
Performance
APMU vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APMU achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than MEAR's 1.06% return.
APMU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 4.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEAR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
APMU vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF | 0.44% | 4.50% | 0.86% | 1.24% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 1.06% | 3.76% | 3.40% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between APMU and MEAR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APMU vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank
APMU
MEAR
APMU vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APMU | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.91 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 7.07 | -5.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 28.99 | -23.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APMU | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 3.86 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.11 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
APMU vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APMU drawdown since its inception was -4.39%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APMU and MEAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APMU | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -2.68% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.40% | -0.47% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.41% | -0.86% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | 0.00% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.93% | -0.19% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 0.11% | +0.70% |
Volatility
APMU vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison
ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) at 0.24%. This indicates that APMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APMU | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 0.24% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.68% | 0.61% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 0.86% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.81% | 0.98% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.81% | 1.52% | +1.29% |
APMU vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
APMU has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
APMU vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison
APMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than MEAR's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF | 2.66% | 2.63% | 2.42% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 2.84% | 2.95% | 3.44% | 3.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APMU and MEAR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APMU has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to MEAR (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APMU dropped -4.39% vs MEAR's -2.68%.
On 3-year performance, MEAR leads with 3.58% vs 3.03% for APMU. On fees, MEAR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MEAR has performed better with a 3.58% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MEAR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for APMU.
MEAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.66% for APMU.
They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for APMU and 0.25% for MEAR.
MEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APMU and MEAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer