APLZ vs. SHRT
APLZ (Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF) and SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. APLZ is passively managed, while SHRT is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APLZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for SHRT.
Performance
APLZ vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APLZ
- 1D
- 5.04%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHRT
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -18.12%
- 6M
- -17.36%
- 1Y
- -22.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APLZ vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APLZ Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF | -86.93% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -13.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLZ and SHRT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLZ vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank
APLZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SHRT
APLZ vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APLZ | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.73 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -2.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APLZ vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLZ drawdown since its inception was -91.78%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLZ and SHRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLZ | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.78% | -26.57% | -65.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.49% | -26.57% | -62.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.58% | -8.49% | -49.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.13% | — |
Volatility
APLZ vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLZ | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.87% | 13.53% | +206.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.87% | 12.84% | +207.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.87% | 12.84% | +207.03% |
APLZ vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
APLZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
APLZ vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison
APLZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APLZ Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APLZ and SHRT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHRT is cheaper at 1.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHRT is cheaper with a 1.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for APLZ.
SHRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for APLZ.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for APLZ and 1.35% for SHRT.
Find the right allocation for APLZ and SHRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer