PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLZ vs. BMNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLZ vs. BMNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


APLZ

1D
5.04%
1M
4.16%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNZ

1D
9.79%
1M
76.32%
YTD
29.97%
6M
50.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLZ vs. BMNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APLZ and BMNZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLZ vs. BMNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APLZ vs. BMNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APLZ vs. BMNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLZ drawdown since its inception was -91.78%, which is greater than BMNZ's maximum drawdown of -70.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLZ and BMNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLZBMNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.78%

-70.80%

-20.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.49%

-27.23%

-62.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.58%

-50.65%

-6.93%

Volatility

APLZ vs. BMNZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLZBMNZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

219.87%

187.04%

+32.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

219.87%

187.04%

+32.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

219.87%

187.04%

+32.83%

APLZ vs. BMNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNZ's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

APLZ vs. BMNZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither APLZ nor BMNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


APLZ and BMNZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BMNZ is cheaper at 1.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BMNZ is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for APLZ.

APLZ and BMNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

APLZ tracks Applied Digital Corporation (APLD), while BMNZ tracks BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for APLZ and 1.31% for BMNZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLZ and BMNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer