APLY vs. SPIN
APLY (YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and SPIN (State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APLY returned 30.59% vs 16.02% for SPIN. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. APLY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPIN.
Performance
APLY vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APLY achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 5.55% return.
APLY
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.33%
SPIN
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.70M | $1.76M | $1.65M | |
| $98.77K | $151.14K | $120.62K |
APLY vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 5.98% | 4.69% | 11.38% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.55% | 14.14% | 6.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLY and SPIN is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLY vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank
APLY
SPIN
APLY vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APLY | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 1.64 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 6.56 | -0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APLY vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLY drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than SPIN's maximum drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLY and SPIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLY | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.41% | -16.85% | -13.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -9.81% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | 0.00% | -9.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -2.21% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 2.45% | +2.48% |
Volatility
APLY vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) has a higher volatility of 9.62% compared to State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) at 3.70%. This indicates that APLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLY | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.62% | 3.70% | +5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.88% | 8.88% | +9.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.61% | 11.67% | +9.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 14.28% | +7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 14.28% | +7.45% |
APLY vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
APLY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
APLY vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison
APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.97%, more than SPIN's 4.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 36.97% | 36.38% | 24.95% | 14.36% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 4.89% | 8.20% | 2.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APLY and SPIN have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APLY has higher volatility (9.62%) compared to SPIN (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLY dropped -30.41% vs SPIN's -16.85%.
On 1-year performance, APLY leads with 30.59% vs 16.02% for SPIN. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, APLY has performed better with a 30.59% return vs 16.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for APLY.
APLY has the higher dividend yield at 36.97%, compared with 4.89% for SPIN.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for APLY and 0.25% for SPIN.
APLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APLY and SPIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer