PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLY vs. PLTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLY vs. PLTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLY achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than PLTY's -21.97% return.


APLY

1D
-1.03%
1M
-2.06%
6M
7.46%
YTD
5.98%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.33%

PLTY

1D
1.34%
1M
-1.53%
6M
-7.13%
YTD
-21.97%
1Y
-15.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
51.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.70M$1.76M$1.65M
$4.73M$4.00M$5.86M

APLY vs. PLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
5.98%4.69%9.93%
PLTY
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-21.97%78.06%52.50%

Correlation

The correlation between APLY and PLTY is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLY vs. PLTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APLY
APLY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTY
PLTY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APLY vs. PLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APLYPLTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.97

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

-0.37

+2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

-0.70

+6.92

APLY vs. PLTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the PLTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLY and PLTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APLY vs. PLTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLY drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, smaller than the maximum PLTY drawdown of -41.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLY and PLTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLYPLTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.41%

-41.36%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-41.36%

+29.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.63%

-32.33%

+22.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-14.45%

+7.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

21.87%

-16.94%

Volatility

APLY vs. PLTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) is 9.62%, while YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that APLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLYPLTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.62%

11.17%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.88%

33.99%

-16.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.61%

44.10%

-22.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

52.18%

-30.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

52.18%

-30.45%

APLY vs. PLTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

APLY vs. PLTY - Dividend Comparison

APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.97%, less than PLTY's 121.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
36.97%36.38%24.95%14.36%
PLTY
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
121.57%112.44%7.85%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APLY and PLTY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTY has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to APLY (9.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLY dropped -30.41% vs PLTY's -41.36%.

On 1-year performance, APLY leads with 30.59% vs -15.35% for PLTY. On fees, PLTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, APLY has been the lower-risk option at 9.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, APLY has performed better with a 30.59% return vs -15.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for APLY.

PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 121.57%, compared with 36.97% for APLY.

Their fees differ too: 1.04% for APLY and 0.99% for PLTY.

APLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLY and PLTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer