APLY vs. AMZP

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

APLY (YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APLY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while AMZP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APLY returned 30.59% vs 24.77% for AMZP. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. APLY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMZP.

Performance

APLY vs. AMZP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLY achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly lower than AMZP's 13.99% return.

APLY

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -2.06%
• 6M: 7.46%
• YTD: 5.98%
• 1Y: 30.59%
• 3Y*: 10.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.33%

AMZP

• 1D: 2.79%
• 1M: 12.20%
• 6M: 10.20%
• YTD: 13.99%
• 1Y: 24.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF	$270.84K	$294.21K	$413.33K
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	$2.70M	$1.76M	$1.65M

APLY vs. AMZP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	5.98%	4.69%	18.62%	6.30%
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF	13.99%	9.56%	37.42%	7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between APLY and AMZP is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023	0.33

Return for Risk

APLY vs. AMZP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APLY

APLY Risk / Return Rank: 60
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 52

AMZP

AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 31
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APLY vs. AMZP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APLY	AMZP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	0.75	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	1.30	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.16	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	1.05	+1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.22	2.32	+3.90

APLY vs. AMZP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the AMZP Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLY and AMZP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APLY vs. AMZP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLY drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than AMZP's maximum drawdown of -27.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLY and AMZP.

Drawdown Indicators

	APLY	AMZP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.41%	-27.36%	-3.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.76%	-23.64%	+11.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.63%	-2.73%	-6.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.75%	-6.46%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	10.69%	-5.76%

Volatility

APLY vs. AMZP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) is 9.62%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP) has a volatility of 15.53%. This indicates that APLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APLY	AMZP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.62%	15.53%	-5.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.88%	27.57%	-9.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.61%	33.40%	-11.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.73%	28.52%	-6.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.73%	28.52%	-6.79%

APLY vs. AMZP - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than AMZP's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

APLY vs. AMZP - Dividend Comparison

APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.97%, more than AMZP's 17.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF	17.83%	22.04%	15.15%	2.45%
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	36.97%	36.38%	24.95%	14.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APLY and AMZP in my portfolio?

APLY and AMZP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APLY or AMZP?

AMZP has higher volatility (15.53%) compared to APLY (9.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLY dropped -30.41% vs AMZP's -27.36%.

Which ETF is better, APLY or AMZP?

On 1-year performance, APLY leads with 30.59% vs 24.77% for AMZP. On fees, AMZP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, APLY has been the lower-risk option at 9.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APLY or AMZP?

Over the 1-year period, APLY has performed better with a 30.59% return vs 24.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APLY or AMZP?

AMZP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for APLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APLY or AMZP?

APLY has the higher dividend yield at 36.97%, compared with 17.83% for AMZP.

What is the main difference between APLY and AMZP?

APLY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMZP is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for APLY and 0.99% for AMZP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.