APLU vs. BYLD
APLU (Allspring Core Plus ETF) and BYLD (iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. APLU is actively managed, while BYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, APLU returned 6.60% vs 8.83% for BYLD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. APLU charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BYLD.
Performance
APLU vs. BYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APLU achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than BYLD's 1.37% return.
APLU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BYLD
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 8.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- 3.11%
APLU vs. BYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
APLU Allspring Core Plus ETF | 0.71% | 7.38% | -1.93% |
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | 1.37% | 8.41% | -1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLU and BYLD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between APLU and BYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLU vs. BYLD — Risk / Return Rank
APLU
BYLD
APLU vs. BYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APLU | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 2.28 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 3.39 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.44 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.36 | -1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | 14.54 | -7.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APLU | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.28 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.58 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
APLU vs. BYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLU drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum BYLD drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLU and BYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLU | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -14.75% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -2.71% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.21% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -2.53% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.63% | +0.16% |
Volatility
APLU vs. BYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) is 1.66%, while iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) has a volatility of 1.77%. This indicates that APLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APLU | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 1.77% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 2.77% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.24% | 3.91% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 5.16% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 5.43% | -0.32% |
APLU vs. BYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
APLU has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BYLD's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
APLU vs. BYLD - Dividend Comparison
APLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, which matches BYLD's 5.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLU Allspring Core Plus ETF | 5.31% | 5.13% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | 5.31% | 5.32% | 5.31% | 4.45% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 3.41% | 3.67% | 4.22% | 3.22% | 3.14% | 3.37% |