APHU vs. TSLZ
APHU (T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APHU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Amphenol Corporation (APH), while TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. APHU is passively managed, while TSLZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. APHU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
APHU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APHU
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 11.66%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -16.87%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -3.97%
- 1Y
- -65.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APHU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APHU T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF | -10.94% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -15.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between APHU and TSLZ is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APHU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
APHU
TSLZ
APHU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF (APHU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APHU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | -0.67 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
APHU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APHU drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APHU and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APHU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -99.11% | +55.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.13% | -98.98% | +82.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -75.39% | +53.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 60.77% | — |
Volatility
APHU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APHU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 55.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.15% | 91.68% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.15% | 116.96% | -23.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.15% | 116.96% | -23.81% |
APHU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
APHU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
APHU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
APHU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APHU T-REX 2X Long APH Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.71% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APHU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for APHU.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for APHU.
APHU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for APHU and 1.05% for TSLZ.
Find the right allocation for APHU and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer