APHMX vs. FMDGX
APHMX (Artisan Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. APHMX is actively managed, while FMDGX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, APHMX returned 0.84%/yr vs 4.44%/yr for FMDGX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. APHMX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.
Performance
APHMX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APHMX achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's 0.68% return.
APHMX
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.42%
FMDGX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- -2.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
APHMX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APHMX Artisan Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class | 3.12% | 15.18% | 12.04% | 24.30% | -36.67% | 10.41% | 58.98% | 0.80% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.68% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between APHMX and FMDGX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between APHMX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APHMX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
APHMX
FMDGX
APHMX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class (APHMX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APHMX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.99 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | -0.20 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | -0.56 | +3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APHMX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APHMX drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APHMX and FMDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APHMX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -38.59% | -25.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -14.75% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.61% | -25.30% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.56% | -38.59% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.13% | -6.12% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.78% | -11.03% | -3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 5.23% | -1.57% |
Volatility
APHMX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
Artisan Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class (APHMX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) have volatilities of 5.38% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APHMX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 5.13% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.36% | 13.73% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.49% | 17.42% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.23% | 22.50% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 24.22% | -1.68% |
APHMX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
APHMX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
APHMX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
APHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.71%, more than FMDGX's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APHMX Artisan Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class | 14.71% | 15.17% | 12.57% | 0.00% | 0.48% | 16.18% | 12.92% | 11.35% | 24.76% | 13.75% | 8.55% | 15.38% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.84% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, APHMX and FMDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
APHMX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to FMDGX (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APHMX dropped -64.45% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.
APHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APHMX and FMDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer