PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APGZX vs. FOCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APGZX vs. FOCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APGZX achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than FOCPX's 26.61% return. Over the past 10 years, APGZX has underperformed FOCPX with an annualized return of 16.76%, while FOCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.54% annualized return.


APGZX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.94%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.36%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
16.76%

FOCPX

1D
0.82%
1M
10.06%
YTD
26.61%
6M
27.59%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
34.50%
5Y*
19.15%
10Y*
22.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APGZX vs. FOCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APGZX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z
6.42%13.26%25.47%35.12%-28.74%29.00%34.47%34.24%2.30%31.81%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
26.61%22.21%38.95%42.64%-32.08%24.94%46.75%39.20%-3.30%38.61%

Correlation

The correlation between APGZX and FOCPX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.93

The correlation between APGZX and FOCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APGZX vs. FOCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APGZX
APGZX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
APGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
APGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCPX
FOCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FOCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APGZX vs. FOCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APGZXFOCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

3.53

-2.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

4.38

-2.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.59

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

5.45

-4.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.64

24.12

-19.48

APGZX vs. FOCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APGZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the FOCPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APGZX and FOCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APGZXFOCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

3.53

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.85

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

1.01

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.66

+0.17

Drawdowns

APGZX vs. FOCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APGZX drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum FOCPX drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGZX and FOCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APGZXFOCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-70.25%

+36.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.21%

-11.29%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.57%

-24.82%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.87%

-37.05%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-37.05%

+3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-17.01%

+10.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

2.55%

+1.54%

Volatility

APGZX vs. FOCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) is 3.11%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that APGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APGZXFOCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

5.41%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

13.88%

-2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

17.74%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.15%

22.65%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

22.44%

-2.77%

APGZX vs. FOCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APGZX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCPX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

APGZX vs. FOCPX - Dividend Comparison

APGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.18%, more than FOCPX's 6.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APGZX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z
9.18%9.77%6.62%1.69%0.87%7.19%2.60%3.49%9.11%3.78%2.72%0.00%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
6.14%7.78%16.76%0.05%4.06%11.53%6.23%7.58%7.93%4.86%3.24%5.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


APGZX and FOCPX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOCPX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to APGZX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APGZX dropped -33.87% vs FOCPX's -70.25%.

FOCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APGZX and FOCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer