PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APGZX vs. AWYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APGZX vs. AWYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APGZX achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than AWYIX's 1.88% return.


APGZX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.94%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.36%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
16.76%

AWYIX

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.85%
1Y
10.37%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APGZX vs. AWYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
APGZX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z
6.42%13.26%25.47%35.12%-28.74%29.00%34.47%34.24%1.71%
AWYIX
CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund
1.88%7.66%18.19%16.39%-15.59%29.51%12.75%35.07%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between APGZX and AWYIX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between APGZX and AWYIX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APGZX vs. AWYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APGZX
APGZX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
APGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
APGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

AWYIX
AWYIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AWYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AWYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APGZX vs. AWYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APGZXAWYIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.07

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

1.56

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.64

4.95

-0.30

APGZX vs. AWYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APGZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the AWYIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APGZX and AWYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APGZXAWYIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.07

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.54

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.68

+0.16

Drawdowns

APGZX vs. AWYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APGZX drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum AWYIX drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGZX and AWYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APGZXAWYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-35.79%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.21%

-8.35%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.57%

-18.72%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.87%

-19.82%

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.19%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-5.03%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

2.23%

+1.86%

Volatility

APGZX vs. AWYIX - Volatility Comparison

AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX) at 2.33%. This indicates that APGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APGZXAWYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

2.33%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

7.45%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

9.90%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.15%

14.42%

+5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

17.88%

+1.79%

APGZX vs. AWYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APGZX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than AWYIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

APGZX vs. AWYIX - Dividend Comparison

APGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.18%, more than AWYIX's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
APGZX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z
9.18%9.77%6.62%1.69%0.87%7.19%2.60%3.49%9.11%3.78%2.72%
AWYIX
CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund
2.15%1.74%5.77%1.80%3.23%6.35%6.87%3.82%6.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APGZX and AWYIX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APGZX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to AWYIX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APGZX dropped -33.87% vs AWYIX's -35.79%.

APGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APGZX and AWYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer