APGAX vs. ALTHX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio (ALTHX).
APGAX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Oct 1, 1996. ALTHX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Dec 28, 1986.
Performance
APGAX vs. ALTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
APGAX vs. ALTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APGAX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | -12.84% | 12.96% | 25.09% | 34.66% | -28.96% | 28.60% | 34.05% | 33.77% | 1.97% | 31.36% |
ALTHX AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio | -0.46% | 5.05% | 2.36% | 5.76% | -10.06% | 2.15% | 4.77% | 7.22% | 0.46% | 5.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APGAX achieves a -12.84% return, which is significantly lower than ALTHX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, APGAX has outperformed ALTHX with an annualized return of 14.15%, while ALTHX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.
APGAX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- -12.84%
- 6M
- -12.69%
- 1Y
- 7.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
ALTHX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.85%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
APGAX vs. ALTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
APGAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than ALTHX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
APGAX vs. ALTHX — Risk / Return Rank
APGAX
ALTHX
APGAX vs. ALTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio (ALTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APGAX | ALTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 0.96 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | 1.30 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.26 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 1.06 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | 3.35 | -2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APGAX | ALTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.96 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.22 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.52 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.11 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between APGAX and ALTHX is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
APGAX vs. ALTHX - Dividend Comparison
APGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.98%, more than ALTHX's 3.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APGAX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | 12.98% | 11.31% | 7.44% | 1.75% | 0.97% | 8.04% | 2.87% | 3.66% | 9.96% | 4.09% | 2.74% | 9.23% |
ALTHX AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio | 3.53% | 4.55% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 2.34% | 1.57% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 3.11% | 3.37% |
Drawdowns
APGAX vs. ALTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APGAX drawdown since its inception was -67.19%, which is greater than ALTHX's maximum drawdown of -15.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGAX and ALTHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APGAX | ALTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.19% | -15.22% | -51.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.33% | -4.55% | -10.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.04% | -14.37% | -19.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -14.37% | -19.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.33% | -2.55% | -12.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.51% | -2.00% | -17.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 1.44% | +2.50% |
Volatility
APGAX vs. ALTHX - Volatility Comparison
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio (ALTHX) at 1.06%. This indicates that APGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APGAX | ALTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 1.06% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 1.72% | +9.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.92% | 4.71% | +15.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 3.85% | +16.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 3.95% | +15.65% |